Is Natural Gas the Segway Away From The U.S.Oil Dependence?

The natural gas industry’s drilling into the Marcellus Shale formation in Pennsylvania and neighboring states along the Appalachian Mountains are at the forefront of many conversations in the state and the country today. With drilling supporter Pennsylvania Governor Tom Corbett calling for the commonwealth to become the “Texas of the Marcellus Shale boom” and a GOP legislature, the industry has political support in Harrisburg secured.

The natural gas boom is already underway in the 400 million year old Marcellus shale reserves beneath Pennsylvania.  That boom is apparent on a hilltop about an hour from Wilkes-Barre, Pa., where the farmland and forest give way to a brand new industrial site known as the Lathrop compressor station. It’s a collection of pipes and compressors that help move natural gas from local wells to market.  The Manager for Williams Companies Inc., Michael Dickinson, has stated, “There are about 75 wells behind this  particular station, and plans to double that over the next couple of years.”  The company operates two compressor stations in Pennsylvania, with plans to add three more. It’s also building a new 30-mile stretch of pipeline to transport natural gas on to  Philadelphia and New York City.  Dickinson has given the comparison of, “Those pipelines are kind of like the railroads are to the coal industry, or the high line wires are to the electricity industry.”  “We have to have those pipelines, that infrastructure, to get this gas to the place that it can be used.”  As far as the technology, I would favor natural gas electric generation over coal generation or nuclear power generation.  Energy experts say the accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant in Japan will likely put the brakes on plans for additional nuclear power plants, at least in the short run.

Natural gas is relatively clean and cheap to burn while environmental regulations in the U.S. make new coal plants unlikely.
Even though I am an advocate for renewable power sources like solar and wind but they are just not ready to satisfy the current
demand for electricity.  So I predict the accelerated development of natural gas in Pennsylvania, as the future source of energy in theU.S. At this point we need to take into consideration the questions that continue to be raised about the impact on the  environment, especially water.  Today there are uncomfortable questions coming to light by those investigative reporting on fracking the Marcellus Shale.  The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is embarking on a new review of the impacts from the industry on local water supplies and spill concerns.

Here in lies the problem.  The Marcellus shale runs from Kentucky to upstate New York, and contains one of the largest natural gas reserves in the world, although the gas has been difficult to extract until recently.  In order to get natural gas out of the Marcellus shale, drillers have to use a process known as hydraulic fracturing or fracking. That produces lots of wastewater, which critics
fear will contaminate drinking water supplies.

Those concerns got a lot of attention in Gasland, director Josh Fox’s Oscar-nominated documentary.  The natural gas industry and
state regulators denounced the film as misleading and one-sided. But those who study the industry say you can’t dismiss its claims entirely as there have been some environmental incidents.  Noted mass kills of aquatic wildlife have been attributive to the waste by products being forced to the surface and the cracking of the rock have allows this waste to be pushed to the surface.  The Gas Industry says they can plug these holes when they occur but we are talking about holes looking more like Swiss Cheese instead of a single hole.  So again I ask at what true cost is this technology really going to cost if it is done correctly for the health of the people and environment.  What we need to do is make sure we do have the proper regulations in place, make sure the companies are using the best available technologies.

For now, regulators in New Yorkhave put a moratorium on new gas wells while they study the environmental impact. In  Pennsylvania, Corbett created a commission to explore whether new regulations are necessary. The group will report back to him this summer. But Pennsylvania regulators may have to work fast, because no one expects the natural gas industry to wait.

In conclusion I ask, “What is the true cost to responsibly extract this gas energy source and in this current economic atmosphere how much will we accept the negative health and environmental aspects to overlook this technology for the sake of jobs?”

The wealth of natural resources of the Appalachian Mountains has been a curse more so than a blessing for the people living in this area.  Clear cut logging in the late 1800’s causing erosion of the land with the vast wealth going to the “Robber Barons” of the time generating a few low paying jobs for the locals or the economic enslavement by the coal industry, “King Coal,” in the early 1900’s all the way into the 1950’s of those non-union miners.

Today the current strip mining is damaging the drinking water aquifer along with the property values of those owning homes in these areas returning only a few economic benefits for the local economy.

Now once again the health concerns of those living in the area where fracking the earth’s crust will only devalue the homes they live in and long term health of their families and once again the vast wealth will go to someone else.

History has taught us that outside interests have always reaped the vast wealth of the Appalachian Mountains and it will be those living there with their families and homes will suffer the long term consequences.


Tags: , , ,

6 Responses to “”

  1. jackjodell53 Says:

    The only problems with natural gas are that it’s not renewable like solar, and the fact that many of the same energy pigs like the Koch brothers and T. Boone Pickens already have their fingers all over it!

  2. Engineer Of Knowledge Says:

    Hello Jack,
    True…very true. But my gut feeling is that the powers to be will ram this ahead in full speed ahead. Many in the area will become sick or die from the waste by products.

  3. microdot Says:

    mr. engineer, I saw this post on mudrakes blog and replied…I will repost my comment here. I had my own energy crisis yesterday, losing internet and power off and on through out the day due to huge storms…we were lucky, no wind or hail damage and we really needed the rain…luckily, the power came back before I even had to consider firing up my generator for the freezer.

    I was off line much of yesterday because of a long overdue storm…we lost our phone and internet and power for most of the day, but very lucky, no hail or wind damage. The results, my vegetable garden is suddenly much more lush…we really needed rain.
    I came over here to find a defense of fraking, presented as a reasonable alternative solution to Americas energy problem. You’ve already pointed out the incredible environmental damage this process entails. The effects of the ground water pollution aree already being seen in Pennsylvania.
    This is a short term solution which only prolongs our carbon based energy addiction. It only will benefit the corporations which stand to reap even higher immediate short term profits with a minimum of investment for the future. Another “End Time” non solution. We consumers gain nothing but the possibility of keeping our air conditioning running at higher costs for the time being.
    I’ve already written much about the ecological/human disaster already in motion because of ethanol. More land is required for the burn out agricultural methods needed to produce the hybrid corn, sugar cane and beet products used in its manufacture. When you talk about the use of ethanol in Brazil, you really have to look at the incrementally increasing destruction of the rain forests as more and more land is illegally converted to crop land for the short term gains of ethanol production.
    In the USA, already huge areas of farmland in the midwest are being destroyed by the use of hybrid corns and destructive agricultural techniques needed for intense, heavily subsidiesed ethanol production.
    The bottom line in my book is that these are all “End Time” solutions. Industry, the population, the government are all operating as if we are living in a biblically preordained scenario.
    We are learning the very hard way that nuclear energy is not a solution. It was fascinating to play with the dragon, lull ourselves into the false belief that we could tame it, but when you play with dragons, you will inevitably get burned and burned we have been, as more and more areas of the planet turn into nuclear sacrifice zones…don’t kid yourself about Fukushima. Just because it has temporarily disappeared from the news cycle, it still gets worse.
    The trouble with “short term” solutions is that idea of “short” always becomes a long term reality. If it is cheap, and easy and profitable, human inertia will guarantee that it becomes the long term norm.
    If we start into a program of short term gap filling “fraking” now, it will go on until every available source is used and the environment is trashed. We are still doing this with coal.
    The truly good news is that clean energy really exists. The research and development and perfection of the techniques is being funded and pushed by many countries who stand to become the leaders and will make the real energy profits in the 21st century. There are so many solutions and there are so many things happening that you don’t hear about even in the USA.
    We are there…we just have to take the rest of the planet with us.
    To invest in END TME solutions is a death wish.
    We really do have a future.

  4. Engineer Of Knowledge Says:

    Hello Microdot,
    I have to agree with you too. Any hydro-carbon fuel is only a short term solution at best with all of the same old problems. Natural Gas is an “End of Time” solution that will steal the wealth of the common man in things like home value, health of his family, etc. with little economic benefit to the area. A “Loose / Loose” situation.

    That being said, the natural gas industry will push and develop the infrastructure move the project forward.

  5. lacithedog Says:

    I’ve pretty much commented at Mucky’s, but there are better sustainable alternatives out there. Unfortunately, the coal and petroleum industries have a lock on the industry.

  6. johnny farris Says:

    i have a natural gas company that is using a compressor to suck gas from my wells but they are sucking so hard that the meters dont read and my pilot lights go out to me they are creating a safty hazared as well as stealing my gas does anyone have an idea on how to stop this.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: